Alas, too much of our discussion of gun rights these days starts and ends from a primitive understanding of the relationship between the Constitution’s statements about our rights and the real-world applications of those rights.
Put simply, the Constitution is almost always direct and simple. Amendment 1, for example, says ”Congress shall make no law” limiting speech, or imposing religion, or interfering with your practice of religion, or limiting the press. What could be clearer? “No law” means “NO LAW,” right?
But practice is always murkier. Thus, while I have freedom of speech, we all know I can’t yell “fire” in a crowded theater (when no fire is present). Likewise, if I oppose scientific medicine on religious grounds, I have the religious freedom to refuse to go to the doctor. However, the law says I have to take my son to the doctor regardless of my beliefs. And of course I have the right to assemble peaceably to petition government for redress of grievances, but I can’t block traffic just because I want to. No right is absolute and inviolable regardless of circumstance or context.
But not, according to the gun nuts, the second amendment. The gun wackos quote the second amendment—which has a limiting amendatory preface that the first amendment lacks—as if it is gospel. No limitation of any kind can be accepted … because the Constitution says so! The Second Amendment, then, is special, different: the one that is not subject to any kind of real world analysis or compromise.
It’s analytically primitive twaddle, but it drives our discourse about guns in America. We are the worse for it.
-
biggrobb01 reblogged this from politicalprof
-
econtacted likes this
-
marcelino69 likes this
-
lararal36 likes this
-
heyschroddie reblogged this from politicalprof
-
touringthecarousel likes this
-
neutrail reblogged this from politicalprof
-
therealsabolish reblogged this from politicalprof
-
existentialandshit likes this
-
thestreetsarepavedwithcheese likes this
-
ejschaef reblogged this from politicalprof
-
theedwebb likes this
-
chasingmonet reblogged this from politicalprof
-
milksheikh likes this
-
mehreenkasana likes this
-
lindadrinksoda likes this
-
almostbatman likes this
-
breathesfreely reblogged this from politicalprof
-
saidthefishinthepot likes this
-
diariocruz likes this
-
jeffballance likes this
-
axiones likes this
-
oofoofoofoofoofoofbaha likes this
-
classicidiot likes this
-
potassiumpaper reblogged this from politicalprof
-
executivechairmen likes this
-
whitecolonialism likes this
-
catiev likes this
-
olivialea likes this
-
samonmars reblogged this from politicalprof
-
ghostchristo reblogged this from politicalprof
-
j-for-justice likes this
-
j-for-justice said:
I suppose this is true in the opinions of people, but in practice, there ARE many limitations on guns, so, I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make. And that’s not even starting on the fact that it is a huge and blatant fallacy to say that the school shooting had…
-
blissandzen likes this
-
noonemeansme likes this
-
corporationsarepeople reblogged this from other-stuff
-
leonrw likes this
-
other-stuff reblogged this from politicalprof
-
heynicoleeee likes this
-
freebroccoli reblogged this from politicalprof and added:
How about we follow the first amendment just as strictly as the “gun wackos” want us to follow the second? If congress...
-
god--made--man likes this
-
discerning-ruffian reblogged this from politicalprof
-
phroyd reblogged this from politicalprof
-
timkirchs likes this
-
logicianmagician likes this
-
viciousneutral likes this
-
aprettyfaceandelectricsoul reblogged this from politicalprof
-
passiveaggressivepositivity reblogged this from politicalprof
-
happy2bgrace likes this
-
irepairspaceships likes this
- Show more notes