December 17, 2012
Of Rights and Guns

Alas, too much of our discussion of gun rights these days starts and ends from a primitive understanding of the relationship between the Constitution’s statements about our rights and the real-world applications of those rights.

Put simply, the Constitution is almost always direct and simple. Amendment 1, for example, says  ”Congress shall make no law” limiting speech, or imposing religion, or interfering with your practice of religion, or limiting the press. What could be clearer? “No law” means “NO LAW,” right?

But practice is always murkier. Thus, while I have freedom of speech, we all know I can’t yell “fire” in a crowded theater (when no fire is present). Likewise, if I oppose scientific medicine on religious grounds, I have the religious freedom to refuse to go to the doctor. However, the law says I have to take my son to the doctor regardless of my beliefs. And of course I have the right to assemble peaceably to petition government for redress of grievances, but I can’t block traffic just because I want to. No right is absolute and inviolable regardless of circumstance or context.

But not, according to the gun nuts, the second amendment. The gun wackos quote the second amendment—which has a limiting amendatory preface that the first amendment lacks—as if it is gospel. No limitation of any kind can be accepted … because the Constitution says so! The Second Amendment, then, is special, different: the one that is not subject to any kind of real world analysis or compromise.

It’s analytically primitive twaddle, but it drives our discourse about guns in America. We are the worse for it.

  1. awindfallofwhims reblogged this from politicalprof
  2. biggrobb01 reblogged this from politicalprof
  3. schroddies reblogged this from politicalprof
  4. hobohemea reblogged this from politicalprof
  5. therealsabolish reblogged this from politicalprof
  6. ejschaef reblogged this from politicalprof
  7. chasingmonet reblogged this from politicalprof
  8. breathesfreely reblogged this from politicalprof
  9. potassiumpaper reblogged this from politicalprof
  10. lil-finga reblogged this from politicalprof
  11. ghostchristo reblogged this from politicalprof
  12. j-for-justice said: I suppose this is true in the opinions of people, but in practice, there ARE many limitations on guns, so, I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make. And that’s not even starting on the fact that it is a huge and blatant fallacy to say that the school shooting had…
  13. corporationsarepeople reblogged this from other-stuff
  14. other-stuff reblogged this from politicalprof
  15. freebroccoli reblogged this from politicalprof and added:
    How about we follow the first amendment just as strictly as the “gun wackos” want us to follow the second? If congress...
  16. defunct-ruffian reblogged this from politicalprof
  17. phroyd reblogged this from politicalprof
  18. aprettyfaceandelectricsoul reblogged this from politicalprof
  19. passiveaggressivepositivity reblogged this from politicalprof
  20. steeperthandeep reblogged this from politicalprof