February 22, 2012
Republicans and “Smaller” Government

One constantly hears that Republicans are the party of small government while Democrats are the party of big government. And, of course, the person making this claim usually makes it clear that small government is good and big government is bad. 

Except, of course, this characterization of the two parties’ positions on government is factual twaddle. 

Think about it this way: some parts of government can be termed the “helping people” parts of government (at least in intent). This part of government includes things like education, welfare, healthcare, food and drug inspections, parks, and even roads and bridges and other infrastructure. The goal—not always achieved—is to give people the tools they need to achieve their ambitions in life.

Another part of government might be termed the “hurting people” part of government. This part of government would include the military, the criminal justice system, fines and taxes and the like. It also includes punishing what some people see as immoral behavior. Note that I don’t think all of this is “bad.” Wars happen, after all, so we do need some kind of a military, and I am quite happy a lot of people who are in prison are there. It’s just that these parts of government are engaged in negative actions to shape or change behavior, rather than attempting to equip people as they build their lives.

So think about the difference in the parties this way: in general, Democrats want the “helping parts” of government to be bigger, and the “hurting people” parts of government to be smaller. (Unless, of course, they want BOTH to be bigger.) Republicans want the “helping people” parts of government to be smaller, and the “hurting people” parts of government to be bigger. 

Note that each has elaborate ideological justifications for these stands. But both are happy with substantial governments. They just differ on how big each part should be.

Libertarians, of course, think both should be as small as possible. Which is why Ron Paul won’t win the Republican Party nomination for President.

  1. loveandchunkybits reblogged this from politicalprof
  2. thetrashhologram reblogged this from politicalprof
  3. miss-wallflower reblogged this from politicalprof
  4. stgccmvl reblogged this from politicalprof
  5. theshook1s reblogged this from politicalprof and added:
    Maybe a bit simplistic for...there’s good insight here. Nice capper,
  6. righteousblasphemy reblogged this from politicalprof
  7. apeacefulplanet reblogged this from politicalprof
  8. soyerpan reblogged this from politicalprof
  9. moyaofthemist reblogged this from icantbelieveitsalawblog
  10. arielnietzsche reblogged this from yourstrulyimtrulyyours
  11. yourstrulyimtrulyyours reblogged this from politicalprof
  12. skophos reblogged this from politicalprof
  13. triplestandard reblogged this from politicalprof
  14. oink-moo reblogged this from politicalprof
  15. let-us-know-nothing reblogged this from killedbyart
  16. my-brain-droppings reblogged this from politicalprof
  17. icantbelieveitsalawblog reblogged this from politicalprof
  18. summersearlysway reblogged this from politicalprof and added:
    numerous arguments I’ve read regarding...small government,
  19. think4yourself reblogged this from politicalprof
  20. wolfperson1 reblogged this from politicalprof
  21. thedoctorinthewhitehouse reblogged this from politicalprof